This doujin was published as part of the Translation Update of the week of the 20th.
Translator: Ero
Editor: Vanitas

Doujins.com link:https://doujins.com/original-doujins-series/fujisaki-fujiko-even-if-i-got-infected-by-the-futanari-disease-im-different-from-all-those-shitty-men-80966

I see things like this, and I become seriously concerned about the Japanese education system.

Base +6, CommonWriter -6, Madu -6, darkerdrick -7, cacatel -6, Tobitsu tai -6, bddha1315 -6, S-One -6, Bla7e -8, anomahous +12, Kalakcha +9, Amuro1X -8, Leriko -6, and 2 more...

I swear all these "man-hater woman becomes like the men she hates the moment she grows a dick" stories only proof how bad men are.
The coup de grace comes when a literal molester is treated as equal to the woman stopping him because she got a boner. And everyone looks at her like she is the problem, not him. What kinda message are you selling author?

Base +6, SomeUne +6, Project_Demise -15, Hardcorey -8, furix -6, boi2554 -6, FerKing -12, Tobitsu tai -6, JonnyBlade78 -5, bddha1315 -6, Joe73461 -13, gweh -29, dersied +10, and 12 more...

Thick glasses girls are truly the best fitting for rape scenarios.

Base +6, Tobitsu tai +6, S-One +6

>What kinda message are you selling author?
It's porn.
>I become seriously concerned about the Japanese education system.
It's porn.

Where are you people even coming from?

Base +7, Romi the Byzantine +8, FerKing +12, Tobitsu tai +6, Incest1234 +8, JonnyBlade78 +5, bddha1315 +6, Joe73461 +13, gweh +29, dersied -10, EcchiProfiler +6, orezz -6, Slayer Liberator +8, and 16 more...

@KikiKanri : Everything here is a fantasm, it doesn't mean anything in real life.
Women having a rape fantasy doesn't mean they want to raped, that's a fantasy, just like when you are watching an horrible horror video game and you don't really want that to happen to you... But it's a bit exciting to think about it. I would say comics are even less a problem since they are drawn, there is no actress why may be mistreated in order to give you this story.

In fact, starting to make a parallel with real life is dangerous no matter how you think about it.

Not to say you can't understand anything of a country from studying its fiction works but it can't be taken to face value.

Base +6

Is it really so hard to understand that a work of art has an intention? I'm not questioning the porn or I would be raving about how women don't magically grow dicks.
This author has a clear agenda and is using porn to live out his issues. It's not hidden at all. He spends several pages going on about "that bitch from work who is independent and looks down on men". How much projection do you need until you realize this is just a hit piece made for pure spite?

Every time some author makes these anti man-hater futa works, they basically just admit that anyone with a dick becomes a mindless animal who only thinks with their dick. It totally backfires, because it makes men seem inherently vile. It speaks of someone who is mentally trapped in believing being a man means being at the edge of rape at all times. And all those evil women who like being independent and look down on him really are hypocrites, because they would rape women if they could!

You can enjoy your phantasy, I see someone with pent up issues who can't even write porn without pushing an agenda.

Base +6, Amuro1X -8, cronotector -6

@KikiKanri
Sure, a work of art can have intention, but not all artists believe in the messages of all of their works. An offhand example, the author of dungeon meshi, a manga about food, is a picky eater in real life, which runs counter to several of the messages of that manga. Plenty of creators write stories that they don't actually believe in.

In this case, this is pornography, and fairly niche pornography at that; the main priority of such works is eroticism and fulfilling the fantasy of the niche, which is "A woman grows a penis and becomes addicted to her newfound sexual urges." As such, her rapidly degenerating into a sex-addicted cock-brained animal isn't trying to make some statement that "being a man means being at the edge of rape at all times", it's just contriving a scenario that the primary buyers of these works want to see. Admittedly, that brings into question why people would want to see that sort of thing, and why the woman would need to grow a penis to get that way, but that's a separate issue to whether or not the author themselves believes these things and/or would want them to be real.

Now, I don't know the author, he could have written some screed on twitter or something about how much he hates independent women that would completely validate your opinion, but I'm just saying that just because someone wrote niche misogynist pornography, it doesn't mean that they're misogynist themselves, nor is this work enough evidence to assume such.

Base +6

@KikiKanri
the intention is to get your rocks off to it you subhuman redditor. There's no agenda. It's hot to see a girl that denied the cock so much let it take over her. That's it.

Base +6

@donglything
You ignored every evidence I provided to the contrary in favor of just repeating "Nah, there is no agenda, clearly this is just porn" with more words.
Why is there an extensive amount of time dedicated to going on about how much of a bitch she is for looking down on men, for her to say she is independent and needs no man and for her to even rebuke a woman getting married to a guy... and then even making people treat her like she is the same as an actual molester on a train before she ever "loses control of her cock"? It's because the author has an issue with independent women and clearly experienced something that made him angry enough to rant about it via a porn book.
The story isn't about how a woman who hates men gets raped by men and starts loving cock, it's a story about a bitch who hates men becoming exactly like the men she hates, which makes men look bad and backfires spectacularly. It's almost funny.

If you people can get your rocks off to the equivalent of an angry twitter rant in drawn form, then be my guest. It's still trash.

Base +6, cronotector -6

@KikiKanri
That's fair, I did kind of waffle around and ultimately not say much, sorry. I'll try again with this post, responding to points you've made in your response.
>Why is there an extensive amount of time dedicated to going on about how much of a bitch she is for looking down on men, for her to say she is independent and needs no man and for her to even rebuke a woman getting married to a guy
Well, primarily it's to set her up as arrogant and prideful to be ironic when she goes lust crazy. It's a common cliche in these sorts of works.

>... and then even making people treat her like she is the same as an actual molester on a train before she ever "loses control of her cock"?
Yeah this scene sucks, the other train passengers shouldn't even be that surprised by it because it's a virus widespread enough to become a news story, much less treat her like a pervert.

>It's because the author has an issue with independent women and clearly experienced something that made him angry enough to rant about it via a porn book.
I think this is the main problem. Your argument is basically that "Because this story is misogynistic and hates on an independent woman, The author must be a misogynist who made this story out of pure spite and hatred for independent women", which is certainly possible, but the story on its own isn't enough proof to definitively back up that claim. If it were, then that would imply that any pornography with sufficient effort put in inherently has its messages endorsed by the artist. Like, do you think the people behind interracial porn site Blacked, for example, are actually black supremacists who think black men are inherently superior at sex, or are they just providing a product for other weirdos who might believe that? Or artists that take a bunch of furry commissions do it because they too are a furry? The more likely thing, at least usually, is that this kind of stuff sells; money is a more convincing motivator for an artistic work than spite.

If you want to argue that the artist really hates women, back it up with stuff outside of the story; If they really are misogynistic and hateful enough to make an entire revenge porno, then they'll definitely show that part of themselves on twitter or something. For example, one of the statements most in favor of your argument, which I'm surprised you haven't mentioned, is the artist question after the story ended, where they claim that the virus is the lady's "punishment" (presumably her punishment for hating men). That statement alone says a lot more about the artist's thoughts on this woman than the actual story does, because in there he doesn't need to fake anything for the sake of the porn; he didn't need to call it a "punishment", he could've just said "who cares, it's porn."

I'm sorry if this still isn't good, or is repeating the same points, there just isn't much of an argument here to have, just differences of perspective here I guess.

Base +6

@KikiKanri
·--··--··-·-·-·-··-···---···
and the intention is to be arousing. as someone already mentioned it, its porn. not every artwork is Tolkien or van Gogh.

Base +11