I'm just going to leave notes here as I do not believe I will win a defaced expunge (the language when it comes to typeset being either cut off or overlapping by either another typeset, scanmarks or otherwise is not stated and unless it's written in stone, it won't pass), but feel I should point out the atrocious issues with this gallery other than the obvious MTL and horrific grammar.

All pages were haphazardly upscaled, making them look blurry and screwing with the contrast.

014.png typeset overlapping.
029.png overlapping advertisement on typeset.
052.png penis tip is blurred.
058.png vaginal wall is excessively blurred and one typeset has cutoff text.
061.png typeset obstructed by scanmark/branding, sfx bubble completely blurred out with no typeset.
073.png excessive typeset obstruction by scanmark/branding.
083.png typeset overlapping.
088.png Typeset cut off.
091.png underwear blurred beyond what the author intended.
095.png tongue and bubble either blurred out or removed.
096.png typeset cut off.
126.png typeset cut off.
129.png typeset cut off by scanmark/branding.
133.png typeset cut off by scanmark/branding.
134.png excessive censorship beyond the authors intent.
139.png typeset obstructing bubble/typeset.
141.png typeset cut off, typeset cut off by scanmark/branding.
143.png typeset cut off.
145.png typeset cut off.
150.png typeset garbled? (the grocery bag)
152.png typeset overlapping.
177.png Excessive blurring of content, typeset cut off.
183.png typeset cut off.
203.png typeset obstructed by scanmark/branding.
222.png Penis is EXCESSIVELY defaced with blurring beyond the authors intent.

I would love to expunge this, but again the language for "defaced" is not clear enough, especially when it comes to defining what is considered "excessive."

Base +27, shintsurugi +16, Shurikensei +10, zurik1917 +6, skyboy19 +9, fodfdfkj +6, Kotovsky +6, ksaelens +6

Thankfully a good few of these already have competent standalone TLs. Bizarre they'd bother.

Base +29