Even without melanin facial features are still the same, this is noticeable with african descendants that are albino. so they arent include in black history month? or what does black history means? i ask as someone who is mixraced, first language wasnt english and never visited EU or North America.
Also is Nyantcha a latina? Where is she from? I know she is actually living Canada.
Yeah, I was going to ask... Though I'm not sure as to the exact vector in this situation.
The use of "mayo"tsona implies political "B" Black. That is, rather than actual racial features, genealogy or anything, that having a non-white (or asian) heritage or upbringing makes you "Black", and visa versa makes you "White."
In practicality, this means that the actual racial makeup doesn't matter, the socio-economic situation does, hence how you can have "Oreo" or "Coconut" (Black on the outside, white inside.) where black people who have been seen to succeed in society are just white people who happen to have black skin. Likewise, the ethnically white Argentina is considered "Black".
This rather turns the actual skintone/racial discussion in to a matter of symbolism and Pathos, a "Black" person turning "White" is more symbolic than practical.
Just changing the skin tone on a person does not make them any different. The different factors which accumulate to the racism that makes "Black" and "White" are far more broad. No, Albino (or Vitiligo, or being mixed-race) does not actually matter. It's all about background, economic status, and cultural perception.
"Mayo" implies a racial profile of being "White" which means this is a racial allegory, similar to a White person dressing up and putting on blackface. The physiology doesn't change, the person doesn't change, but they pretend to be for entertainment in some form or another.
It's all brain-rot.
Base +5, Thranos +7, D-puffel +6, penislord1 +10, NevskyDrift +20