Hey if yall want the rest of my art work I'm VERY active at https://www.pixiv.net/
NEODEMONS. Come and join me to stay updated on all my artwork. This is the only site I'm active at the moment. cheers!!!

Why do you always make the characters so ugly? Like they got hot bodies then a face like a granny's ballsack and the skin tone of vomit. Like wtf

Base +4, wonderbread08 +6, kenabrxg +19, Cyberlink21 +6, Seviper4 +7, sunshineandlolipops +26, randomthe -6, Toritaten +6, Quiv +8, Bunnykill18 +6, raptorshru +6, Lero4ka -6, scribeman +5

anon9980 because pretty faces are so cliche...boring.....and you have seen all the same pretty faces its starting look lame. This is where I come in. I want to see average, flaws, big forehead, funny ears, ugly to normal looking, I want variety. This is why you'll see a lot of AVERAGE looking models that I create to give them character. I want people to
say she's not hot but I'll fuck her as you would say about a women IRL

Base +6, radement +6, sunshineandlolipops -26, randomthe +6, Quiv -8, Neterros -6, raptorshru -6, Lero4ka +6, caveman84 +6

Was a backer for a while on your patreon, shame that you got booted from there honestly, also the coment above is whi i like your stuff, especially ugly on innocent/pretty looking, somehow i fond something i like in the "ugly" being the dominant side usually, cant wait to see more, keep up the good work

Base +6, randomthe +6, Toritaten -6, Lero4ka +6, andycloud +6, caveman84 +6

FINALLY!!!!!! Some more action with putrid shemale monster chicks.

Base +6, Toritaten -6, raptorshru +6, caveman84 +6

To assume that making unappealing pornography is an appropriate way of 'innovating' is misguided. If the innovation makes the porn worse at its job then you've made a mistake.

Unlike normal art, pornography is set to the concrete task of sexually exciting its audience. You can't 'innovate' outside of what accomplishes that goal. If you don't understand this then you are profoundly short-sighted and doomed to fail at making porn.

Furthermore, not everybody has such low self esteem that they see a hideous shamble creature and think "Yeah, they're ugly, but I'd still fuck them", most people just think, "They're ugly" then have their boner killed and can't stomach watching your avant garde monstrosity heave its wrinkled sickly mass all over the place.

Making ugly porn isn't simply bad art, its more than that. It's incorrect art. You may as well have made a knife that won't cut; what an 'innovator' you are.

If you want to surprise an audience with something new, go make normal degenerate art. But what you have done here is the equivalent of trying to sell to femdom fetishists a work in which the man takes charge.
Their predictable displeased response being ,"You have ruined what I find compelling about this, but even worse than that you have given me its opposite."

If your response to complaints was, "I am making this work to specifically and only appeal to the small number of people who sexualize hideousness." then this work would be fine.

But the intentions of the artist matter in the presentation of their work, and from what you've said you have the worst possible mindset for a porn artist. That this novelty is somehow supposed to be appealing to anyone else, and that they will be excited, surprised, or glad to see nutsack textured goblin grandmas flick their pasty fluids about. They won't, they will be disgusted. That's not what people come to porn to see.

Base +7, Baskets +6, andycloud -6, caveman84 -6

Torcoolguy then go buy yourself a blow-up doll buddy, were all natural over here. cheers!!

Base +6, andycloud +6, caveman84 +6

I'm a little late to the party but lmao Torcoolguy I'm losing my mind at the phrase 'incorrect art'. Pretty much everything you said is arbitrary nonsense tailored to your tastes.

And that bullshit about porn serving the soul purpose of sexually exciting it's audience? Straight up untrue. The actual definition of porn is to display sexual acts- specifically in an erotic manner. Whether the artist uses their abilities to the end of exciting, scaring, or straight up disgusting the viewer is entirely up to them.

Normally I wouldn't give a shit because- and I know this might be shocking- people have their own tastes and I can respect that. One hate comment about art I didn't make doesn't bother me in the slightest. I'm not the least bit upset you don't find ballsack grandma goblins arousing. Most people wouldn't.

What upset me enough to bother writing this out is that you put an artist down with some psuedo-artistic rant which is, for all intents and purposes, completely devoid of any actual substance as a critique. Attacking their ability, their motivation, and their purpose in making content through a series of rambling, incoherent, and ad hominem arguments because you can't get hard to what they made is pretty much just a fancy way of bullying.

"That's not what people come to porn to see."

You don't speak for me. You don't speak for anybody. You're one person on the internet, you have no authority to make that claim. That's not what (you) came here to see, don't attack someone's artistic capacity because you don't like what they made or the reason they wanted to make it.

Base +3