That's the thing, giantess fetishists don't care about that. They just get off on the idea of a giant woman, most likely dominating them because they're almost all masochists.
Base +8, Soldier09 -2, Ultima Dragon -19, runix 172 -3
Posted on 04 March 2018, 02:48 UTC by: The Mastermid
Score -41
@BattleshipGascogne None of these fetishes in the comic would make sense to someone who doesn't have them. But plain giantess is the most understandable. What I don't get is fat fetish, foot fetish, furry fetish and muscle fetish. The worst out of those being furry fetish. Why would people want to fuck an animal? Foot fetish, why would you want to be near sweaty and dirty feet? Fat fetish, well unless it is the softness then i don't get it. Muscle fetish, well, this one is definitely a dominance thing. Giantess fetish, I personally have this one so i might be biased, but it is also a dominance thing but sometimes on a lesser scale. I have it because i like the thought of exploring a giant female body. I'm not into being suppressed, in fact, I loath my suppressors. I react very negatively to it. Edit: Just remembered futanari fetish. that one is amongst the weirdest ones, in the same category as furry fetish. Some people who aren't even gay love the stuff, I don't get it.
Base +3, Yuki Makoto -8, Koboter -5, Dgmbl -6, Ultima Dragon -19, joy-sama -6
Posted on 12 March 2018, 19:08 UTC by: CrossfusionX
Score +13
Fetishes are like that, it's really no different then if someone prefers blonde hair on a partner over others. There's no sense in trying to explain them, and as long as they're not doing harm to anyone, no reason to berate them.