Front Page
Watched
Popular
Torrents
Favorites
My Home
My Uploads
Toplists
Bounties
News
Forums
Wiki
HentaiVerse

[Fujiyoshi] Otto no Mae de Kyokon Sounyuu | Getting Penetrated in Front of my Husband (NTR na Kankei) [English] {Hentaku!} [Digital]

[ふじよし] 夫の前で巨根挿入 (NTRな関係) [英訳] [DL版]

Manga
Posted:2019-11-20 02:43
Parent:None
Visible:Yes
Language:English  TR
File Size:16.41 MB
Length:17 pages
Favorited:490 times
Rating:
217
Average: 4.33

Showing 1 - 17 of 17 images

<1>
4 rows
10 rows
20 rows
40 rows
Normal
Large
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
<1>
Posted on 20 November 2019, 02:43 UTC by:   Hentaku_    PM
Uploader Comment
Religious cult ntr.

check out our subreddit at reddit.com/r/hentaku or our site at hentaku.org

Com: anon
Posted on 20 November 2019, 04:57 UTC by:   shsrzrzx    PM
Score +16
is this a sequel?
Posted on 20 November 2019, 07:32 UTC by:   moximoore    PM
Score +234
Page 13's TL note seems oddly placed considering the genre.
Posted on 20 November 2019, 14:21 UTC by:   zhs586    PM
Score +12
no.1 MID Otto?
Posted on 21 November 2019, 00:52 UTC by:   bergil    PM
Score +158
So that's a NTR translated by a SJW, kinda ironic...
Posted on 21 November 2019, 17:35 UTC by:   Maxwelzal    PM
Score +122
@Hentaku_ The majority of NTR revolves around a man's inability to "do his duty" by satisfying his partner. It shouldn't be considered misogynistic to think some form of reciprocity exists. A couple's duty should be to each other. It's a relationship after all, and should run both ways.

...That would be what you'd expect from a healthy relationship, but I don't think you can (or should) expect that from NTR. You don't need to put a note whenever there is clearly an unfavorable depiction of the male lead, through the minimization/reduction of his worth to only his capacity to sexually gratify his partner. Similarly, you don't need to put a note when it pertains to the female counterpart. It's unnecessary and feels a tad disingenuous. I think it's reasonable to assume, and I think most do, that pornography isn't meant for explorations into the values of genuine relationships, and instead resides in the extreme simplification of such ties for carnal and fetishistic purposes. It obviously shouldn't be applied to real life, or even taken seriously.
Last edited on 22 November 2019, 01:56 UTC.
Posted on 23 November 2019, 21:36 UTC by:   Gilgamesch    PM
Score +76
downvoted because it was translated by a faggot that makes unnecessary (and wrong) TL notes
Posted on 25 November 2019, 09:29 UTC by:   happytomorrow    PM
Score +6
I'm pretty much sure that instead of the word "raped" there was a word "violated" in Japanese (they have similar meaning). The sex was completely consensual here.

Also, if the wife can't please her husband and doesn't want to do it then he probably did the wrong choice when married to her and he has full right to watch porn or cheating on her or leaving the marriage completely. People stay in sexless marriages only because of children and finances.

[Post New Comment]

[Front Page]

Terms of Service